{"id":6981,"date":"2025-06-18T14:54:10","date_gmt":"2025-06-18T14:54:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/?p=6981"},"modified":"2026-04-23T14:12:11","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T14:12:11","slug":"epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/","title":{"rendered":"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal has announced that, while the claims are the basis for assessing the patentability of an invention, the description and drawings must <em>always<\/em> be consulted to interpret the claims.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Background<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Until now, there has been diverging case law on the correct way to interpret claim language at the EPO, with differing views on the extent to which the description and drawings should be used to interpret the claims \u2013 should the claims always be interpreted in light of the description and drawings, should the description and drawings only be referred to if the claims are unclear or ambiguous, or should the claims be interpreted in isolation?\u00a0<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Claim interpretation<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Having found that there is no clear legal basis, in terms of an article of the EPC, for claim interpretation when assessing patentability, the Enlarged Board issued two guiding principles:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The claims are the starting point and the basis for assessing the patentability of an invention under Articles 52 to 57 EPC.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The description and drawings are always referred to when interpreting the claims, and not just when the claims are deemed unclear or ambiguous when read in isolation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These guiding principles aim to align EPO examination practice with the current case law of the <a href=\"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/unified-patent-court\/\">Unified Patent Court<\/a> (UPC).<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Lessons<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Today\u2019s decision emphasises the need for care to be taken when drafting and amending the description and drawings, as well as the claims, as information provided in the description and drawings may have a substantial impact on the patentability of the claims.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision also highlights the need to consider fully the potential ramifications of any description amendments requested by an EPO examiner during prosecution \u2013 which are becoming increasingly prevalent \u2013 to avoid any unforeseen impact on the validity of the claims.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal has announced that, while the claims are the basis for assessing the patentability of an invention, the description and drawings must always be consulted to interpret the claims. Background Until now, there has been diverging case law on the correct way to interpret claim language at the EPO, with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":4008,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[344],"tags":[427,428,418],"class_list":["post-6981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry-news-de","tag-case-law-de","tag-european-patent-office-de","tag-patents-de"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24 - Forresters<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24 - Forresters\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal has announced that, while the claims are the basis for assessing the patentability of an invention, the description and drawings must always be consulted to interpret the claims. Background Until now, there has been diverging case law on the correct way to interpret claim language at the EPO, with [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Forresters\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-18T14:54:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-23T14:12:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1667\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jack Dean\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Verfasst von\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jack Dean\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1\u00a0Minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jack Dean\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5889a9b1293f05cb14652e0c953ea064\"},\"headline\":\"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\\\/24\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-18T14:54:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-23T14:12:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":303,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"case law\",\"EPO\",\"patents\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Branchennachrichten\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/\",\"name\":\"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\\\/24 - Forresters\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-18T14:54:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-23T14:12:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5889a9b1293f05cb14652e0c953ea064\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp\",\"width\":2500,\"height\":1667},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\\\/24\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/\",\"name\":\"Forresters\",\"description\":\"Clear Direction\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5889a9b1293f05cb14652e0c953ea064\",\"name\":\"Jack Dean\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8988f16917b5f0e54158d36e2356ad447e042555d0d1ea0cde6e71a719146c9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8988f16917b5f0e54158d36e2356ad447e042555d0d1ea0cde6e71a719146c9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8988f16917b5f0e54158d36e2356ad447e042555d0d1ea0cde6e71a719146c9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jack Dean\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/forresters-ip.com\\\/de\\\/author\\\/jdean\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24 - Forresters","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24 - Forresters","og_description":"The EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal has announced that, while the claims are the basis for assessing the patentability of an invention, the description and drawings must always be consulted to interpret the claims. Background Until now, there has been diverging case law on the correct way to interpret claim language at the EPO, with [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/","og_site_name":"Forresters","article_published_time":"2025-06-18T14:54:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-23T14:12:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2500,"height":1667,"url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Jack Dean","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Verfasst von":"Jack Dean","Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"1\u00a0Minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/"},"author":{"name":"Jack Dean","@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/5889a9b1293f05cb14652e0c953ea064"},"headline":"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24","datePublished":"2025-06-18T14:54:10+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-23T14:12:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/"},"wordCount":303,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp","keywords":["case law","EPO","patents"],"articleSection":["Branchennachrichten"],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/","url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/","name":"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24 - Forresters","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp","datePublished":"2025-06-18T14:54:10+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-23T14:12:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/5889a9b1293f05cb14652e0c953ea064"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/BuildingsPress08_9EC12B17882A435DBE01544D950A17E7-copy.webp","width":2500,"height":1667},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-clarifies-claim-interpretation-in-enlarged-board-of-appeal-decision-g1-24\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"EPO clarifies claim interpretation in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/24"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/","name":"Forresters","description":"Clear Direction","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/5889a9b1293f05cb14652e0c953ea064","name":"Jack Dean","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8988f16917b5f0e54158d36e2356ad447e042555d0d1ea0cde6e71a719146c9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8988f16917b5f0e54158d36e2356ad447e042555d0d1ea0cde6e71a719146c9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8988f16917b5f0e54158d36e2356ad447e042555d0d1ea0cde6e71a719146c9a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jack Dean"},"url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/author\/jdean\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6981"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6981\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8054,"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6981\/revisions\/8054"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}