{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Forresters","provider_url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/","author_name":"Liam Croft","author_url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/author\/liam-c\/","title":"European Patent Office clarifies what represents prior art in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/23 - Forresters","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"d5ls1gaXYU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-prior-art-decision-g1-23\/\">European Patent Office clarifies what represents prior art in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/23<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/de\/epo-prior-art-decision-g1-23\/embed\/#?secret=d5ls1gaXYU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8222;European Patent Office clarifies what represents prior art in Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G1\/23&#8220; &#8211; Forresters\" data-secret=\"d5ls1gaXYU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/forresters-ip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/EPO-The-Hague-scaled.webp","thumbnail_width":2560,"thumbnail_height":1920,"description":"A decision by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) has broadened the scope of what qualifies as prior art and is expected to significantly influence how novelty and inventive step are evaluated. The Board concluded that a product put on the market cannot be excluded from the state of the [&hellip;]"}